Tampa Civil Rights Lawyer - Attorney - Florida Tell Me Your Story 813-222-2220

Tampa Florida Civil Rights Lawyer 813-222-2220 - Attorney W.F. ''Casey Ebsary helps Innocent citizens arrested - this site is their legacy. Conveniently Located: Tampa, Florida 1101 Channelside Drive Number 244, Tampa, FL 33602. Licensed to Practice in Florida, Federal Middle District of Florida, and Federal Eleventh Circuit. Tell Me Your Story - Get Some Help Today! - Toll Free 1-877-793-9290

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Florida Taser Policy Change - Section 1983 Civil Rights

Taser Civil Rights Lawsuit AttorneyFlorida Civil Rights Attorney W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary has obtained an amazing internal memo from a local law enforcement agency. No longer will cops roll up on bicycles and Taser riders. You can review this 12 page policy memo by clicking here. Sad it takes a 12 page memo to explain the obvious. The cover letter notes that "shooting a Taser at a moving vehicle is not specifically prohibited . . . ." then continues in a dozen pages to explain why it is not a good idea to shock someone while they are driving a vehicle.

Been Tasered? Tell Me Your Story Toll Free 1-877-793-9290 .

Source: Media Reports and Pensacola Florida Police Department

Florida Civil Rights Attorney Lawyer Section 1983

Labels: , , , , ,

Friday, October 09, 2009

Sheriff Grady Judd Lawsuit Report

Sheriff Grady Judd has been busy in Federal Court. Check out our free report about cases he has been involved in.


Got Problems in Polk County - Tell Me your Story Toll Free 1-877-793-9290 .

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, July 03, 2009

Tampa Civil Rights Lawyer on School Searches


Tampa Civil Rights Attorney noted that a thirteen-year-old female student's Fourth Amendment rights were violated when she was subjected to search of her bra and underpants by school officials. The just say no, zero tolerance crowd acted on another student's tip that she had brought over-the-counter drugs to school where there were no reasons to suspect the drugs presented a danger or were concealed in student's underwear. So says the Supreme Court.

When civil rights are violated, Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer, W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary, Jr. can take wayward government officials back to school. Call Toll Free 1-877-793-9290. Get some help today!

Tampa Civil Rights Attorney

Source: 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S1011a

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Attorney W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary - Civil Rights Lawyer Tampa Florida 813-222-2220


Get some help today!

Visit our website at CentralLaw.com


Civil Rights Lawyer Tampa Florida 813-222-2220

Attorney W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary, Jr. Helps Innocent Citizens who have been Arrested.

Tell Me Your Story.

Labels: , , , , ,

Florida Attorney Excessive Force in Effecting Arrest

Tampa Civil Rights AttorneyCivil rights lawyer, Attorney W.F. ''Casey'' Ebsary reports that a jury could find plaintiff's constitutional right to be free from excessive force during arrest were violated during a misdemeanor arrest. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta held that after a suspect was handcuffed and cooperating with deputy, a deputy who forcefully dragged the suspect outside, and proceeded to repeatedly “slam” his body into a concrete structure, and who caused him extreme pain, put the suspect in fear for his life, and inflicted serious injuries could be held accountable under section 1983 in federal court. Not surprisingly, the court found it should have been clear to deputy that slamming a handcuffed and cooperating suspect against corner of a concrete wall with sufficient force to break arrestee's ribs and cause a leaking aneurysm was unlawful. The District court erred in granting summary judgment, and throwing out the suspect's case. The deputy was not entitled to qualified immunity.

Source: 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C1321a

Law Enforcement Officers, Excessive Force in Effecting Arrest, Qualified Immunity

Tampa Civil Rights Attorney

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, July 11, 2008

Short Circuit - Taser the Messenger - Reporter Now Protester?

"Don't Tase me Bro!"

GAINESVILLE - According to the AP, a college student who was passionately questioning Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., was tasered after posing difficult questions. A UF student posed questions about impeaching President Bush, why Kerry didn't challenge the 2004 election results and why he and Bush were members of the secret society Skull and Bones at Yale University. The student yelled, "Don't Tase me, bro!" and was then hit with voltage until he shut up.

Civil Rights Attorney Lawyer Tampa Florida

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Civil Rights Lawyer Tampa Florida - Settlement in anti-Bush T-shirt Case

Presidential Advance Manual Authorized Removal of Citizens

A couple arrested at a rally after refusing to cover T-shirts that bore anti-President Bush slogans settled their lawsuit against the federal government for $80,000, the American Civil Liberties Union announced Thursday. The couple were handcuffed and removed from the July 4, 2004, rally at the state Capitol, where Bush gave a speech.

The front of the T-shirts bore the international symbol for “no” superimposed over the word “Bush.” The back of the T-shirt said “Love America, Hate Bush.” On the back of the other T-shirt was the message “Regime Change Starts at Home.” Sources close to the case reported that a presidential advance manual tries to exclude dissenters from the president’s appearances. “As a last resort,” the manual says, “security should remove the demonstrators from the event.”

Civil Rights Lawyer Tampa

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Sentencing Crack Guidelines - Federal Cases - United States Sentencing Commission

The Supreme Court issued decisions in three important cases: Kimbrough, Gall and Watson. In Kimbrough, the court held that a sentencing court had the authority to reject the 100 to 1 crack ratio in determining a reasonable sentence under the Booker analysis. The case gives great deference to the findings of the United States Sentencing Commission regarding the crack/powder disparity. The Sentencing Commission has recently suggested that a 20 to 1 ratio would be appropriate. As a result, it is important that, if you have any crack sentencing cases coming up in the near future, you may want to continue the sentencing so that you can you can address the crack/powder ratio issue in light of the Court's holding in Kimbrough.

Additionally, a reminder that the Sentencing Commission will be meeting today to discuss the retroactivity of the new crack amendment.

Labels: , , , , ,